As soon as I hear “If it were me…” or “I’m the type of person that…” when people explain their frustration or even their rationale for making excuses for someone, I internally say “UH OH.” It immediately shows that they are likely blinkered in their view of things and over-empathising.

We all have our take on things, which represents how we think we’d act in a situation and what we believe might cause us to react in a certain way. We have our perception of what’s behind our and other people’s intentions and how we think similar folks with our values and ideals might or ‘should’ act. In essence, we all have our expectations. When a situation or person doesn’t meet those and our hopes, we are disappointed, which is natural.

The trouble with focusing on what you would do or highlighting what type of person you are is that it makes it very ‘I’ focused. You can’t see the wood for the trees. You’re just one person. The only people who share a similar view to you are those who share your values.

The fact you are interested in someone, or they’re your friend, or you’ve slept together, are in relationship, are madly in love, or they’re family, doesn’t mean they see or do things in the same way as you.

Even if someone does something similar to you or is doing the same thing at the same time as you or with you, it doesn’t mean you share the same intentions. It doesn’t mean you’re each governed by the same mentality.

Classic example: Two people are sleeping together. One intends for it to be more and feels like it’s very special and they’re ‘making love’, and the other person is just having sex.

You might be or do something for certain reasons or under certain circumstances, but someone else might not.

When you over-empathise, you think you’re putting yourself in their shoes. However, you’re actually putting yourself in your own shoes, imagining what you would do and feel in the same situation and what you imagine your intentions might be, and then you’re running with the assumption and projecting it onto the other party. It’s like half empathy or ’emp’; You forgot to include the reality of who they are.

You, for instance, may believe that you would only be driven to crime because you were desperate and/or you were going through a terrible time. You figure you’d want a better opportunity to come along or to be rescued by someone who cared about you. Someone else, though, might commit crimes for entirely different reasons and actually have no desire to stop.

Equally, you might assume that because of your experiences and background that someone else who has their own experiences and background where you feel some ‘synergy’, that they’re operating under the same constraints, mentality, and habits as you. It makes you ask, Who am I to judge? Then you go, Ooh, I have big problems and have made a few mistakes in my time and need someone to give me a chance. Then, ipso facto, you think they need you to give them a chance.

Depending on what the disparity is between what you would do and what someone else does, and, in turn, what this ‘gap’ represents about their character, values, and your future interactions with them, it might indicate incompatibility.

What creates big issues is noticing that someone differs from and that making that all about you. It’s like, I think people should think and act like I do. Why isn’t he/she doing that? Is it because I’m not good enough? You’ll go into situations with a blinkered view and assume people are singing from the same hymn sheet.

You’re not interacting with clones of yourself.

The only person who truly thinks and acts like you is you.

You don’t really need the person if all you’re going to do is project who you think they should be. You have to take the time to get to know people as they are and see them for who they are, not as extensions of you. If you don’t, you’ll become complacent and make dangerous assumptions.

The other person’s behaviour may not even mean they’re ‘wrong’, but what it may mean is that you’re incompatible.

That someone acts differently to you doesn’t make your actions, mentality, and choices wrong. It doesn’t invalidate them; they’re yours.

When you ruminate with the ‘I don’t understand! If it were me, I would have done X or I would have done Y‘ mentality, you’re ignoring the truth and its meaning while actually blaming yourself for something that has nothing to do with you. It becomes, I don’t understand! If it were me, I would have done X or Y. Why didn’t they? Is it because I didn’t answer the phone on three rings or I’m not as pretty as [someone else] or I don’t have Z?

Knowing what you’d do under certain circumstances and your beliefs is you acknowledging your values.

When you experience a disconnect with someone that causes you to be all “What the what now?”, you can look at the results and how you feel and see the other party’s perspective.

I’ve had many a reader tell me, for instance, that if they kept going back to an ex who they knew was crazy about them, it’s because they’d want to get back together. These people have felt the pain of discovering that this wasn’t the case for their ‘boomeranging’ exes. They could spend more time being perplexed by not rekindlng the relationship and hoping their ex will do the right thing nex time. Or they could recognise that it might be how they roll but their exes are rolling them out like a doormat.

You can think about “If it were you”. Equally, though, you can ask, It is [the other party]; what are they doing? You can be perplexed, or you can be… in reality.

Your thoughts?

If you want to ‘un-perplex’ yourself, check out my books The Dreamer and the Fantasy Relationship and Mr Unavailable and the Fallback Girl, which are available from my bookshop.

FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites