A challenge we face when we’re consciously going out of our way to create healthier boundaries after recognising where we need to break unhealthy patterns is an internal debate about giving somebody who hurt or let us down a second chance.
It’s particularly difficult when the person seeks us out. Debating with ourselves over giving the second chance can feel like a test we’re afraid of failing. Give it and everything works out hunky-dory, and we get to pat ourselves on the back. But give it and the person does the same or worse again and we spiral into blame and shame.
In fact, we humans often conflate requests for a second chance with the person’s desire to change. Hell, sometimes we even take it as proof of they’ve already changed. There’s also often an underlying belief that maybe what happened was purely the fault of our own boundaries so giving this person a second chance will be a way of testing how much we’ve grown. We figure we should be more, you know, ‘resilient’ now.
Should we give a second chance now that our boundaries are better? Or, should we not give the second chance precisely because we’ve evolved our boundaries?
For starters, we need to take the ‘should’ out of giving somebody a second chance. This means acknowledging that we’re not sure or even that we don’t want to. Emotionally blackmailing and obligating ourselves into giving a second chance would override our boundaries.
We need to know our ‘why’ when deciding whether to give somebody a second chance because the intentions and motivation behind a decision dictate how we’ll feel in the aftermath.
What, if anything, do we hope to get back in return if we go ahead? What do we think will or should happen? The more honest we can be, the healthier a decision we can make. Let’s say we give this person a second chance and they don’t respect our boundaries. Will we be able to handle this from a boundaried place? Or, will we take it personally and spiral into blaming and shaming ourselves?
If the person we give a second chance to doesn’t have healthy boundaries and expects us to engage at our previous level of boundaries, it’s only a matter of time until it’s pain and problems.
Our intention may be to give another chance, to show support, but the result is that this person will interpret this as a green light to recreate the same problem. If we keep responding with our intentions without awareness of the impact and the truth, we will keep getting the same undesired results because we’re too focused on how we want us and others to look.
By giving out second chances to test the progress of our boundaries, we set ourselves and others up to fail. There is no need for us to set ourselves unnecessary and painful tests just to prove a point to ourselves. That’s us trying to control the uncontrollable and trying to right the wrongs of the past. If we’re going to give someone a second chance, it must be because regardless of what they do or don’t do, we’re going to have better boundaries anyway.
I’ve been running Baggage Reclaim since September 2005, and I’ve spent many thousands of hours writing this labour of love. The site has been ad-free the entire time, and it costs hundreds of pounds a month to run it on my own. If what I share here has helped you and you’re in a position to do so, I would love if you could make a donation. Your support is so very much appreciated! Thank you.
Copyright Natalie Lue 2005-2025, All rights reserved. Written and express permission along with credit is needed to reproduce and distribute excerpts or entire pieces of my work.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.